The diary of Delia : Being a veracious chronicle of the kitchen, with some side-lights on the parlour — Background and Themes
Edition facts
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
The diary of Delia, a kitchen maid, is written in a phonetic dialect that immediately signals her social station and personality. Her first entry begins with a matter-of-fact account of her morning routine: “I got up at siven. Washed. Dressed. Made me bed.” The clipped, unpunctuated style conveys efficiency and a no-nonsense attitude. Yet within the same paragraph, she describes Mr. John pushing aside his “appytising eggs” and “luvly staming coffee” to read his paper, ignoring her. Delia’s response—speaking up despite his clear disinterest—reveals her boldness and the informal dynamic between servant and master. The author, Onoto Watanna, uses Delia’s voice not merely as comic relief but as a lens through which to observe the household’s power structures and hypocrisies.
Dialect as a Marker of Class and Character
Delia’s speech is rendered in a thick Irish brogue, with spellings like “siven,” “furyissly,” “brikfust,” and “shugged me sholders.” This phonetic transcription does more than signal her ethnicity; it establishes her as an outsider within the household, both in terms of class and origin. Her language contrasts sharply with the clipped, formal English of her employers. When Mr. John says, “Delia—what are you waiting for?” the precision of his words underscores his authority. Delia’s narration, however, undercuts that authority by describing his anger as “cam and gintle” and noting his “inwurd anger.” The dialect thus becomes a tool for subversion, allowing Delia to critique her betters while maintaining a veneer of deference.
The Kitchen as a Stage for Social Drama
The subtitle promises “some side-lights on the parlour,” but the excerpts show the kitchen as the true center of action. In one scene, Miss Claire hides Mr. Harry in a china closet while Delia distracts Mr. John. The kitchen becomes a space where class boundaries blur: the maid colludes with the daughter of the house to conceal a romantic intrigue. Later, when Mr. Dudley arrives to confront his son, Mr. Wolley dismissively tells Delia, “Heres your yung man’s father. Just tak him into the kitchen.” The kitchen is treated as a dumping ground for servants’ affairs, yet it is also where secrets are kept and alliances formed. Delia’s position as gatekeeper—literally holding the door or hiding lovers—gives her a quiet power that the parlour’s inhabitants underestimate.
Recurring Motifs of Surveillance and Secrecy
Delia is constantly watching and being watched. She describes herself “watching wid all me eyes” and notes how Mr. John “russelled up the paper the way he has of doing when provoaked.” The household is a network of glances and eavesdropping. The anonymous letter that triggers Mr. Dudley’s visit is a plot device, but it also reflects a world where written communication is suspect. Delia herself pens a warning “in plane litters and langwidge,” mimicking the literacy of her employers while maintaining her own orthography. The repeated emphasis on doors—squeaking, banging, held shut—reinforces the idea of barriers that are constantly breached. Secrets are always on the verge of exposure, and Delia’s diary is itself a form of surveillance, recording what the parlour would prefer hidden.
Diction and the Performance of Servitude
Delia’s language is not merely a record of her speech but a performance of her role. She adopts a tone of exaggerated humility (“I shugged me sholders in the disdainful way I have”) that allows her to express defiance without open insubordination. When Mr. John dismisses her, she “lingered hoping to help him a bit,” a passive-aggressive tactic that the diary makes explicit. Her use of “ses I” and “ses he” as a narrative frame creates a rhythmic, almost theatrical quality, as if she is reporting a play. This self-consciousness suggests that Delia is aware of her part in the household drama and is deliberately playing it for her own amusement—and for the reader’s. The diary form itself becomes a means of asserting her perspective against the official story of the parlour.
Readers should attend to the gaps between what Delia reports and what she understands. Her phonetic spelling is not a sign of ignorance but a deliberate authorial choice that rewards close reading. The diary’s episodic structure, with its short entries and abrupt shifts, mirrors the fragmented nature of domestic service. While the excerpts offer only a partial view of the plot, they provide ample evidence of Watanna’s skill in using dialect, setting, and point of view to create a layered commentary on class, gender, and power in early twentieth-century Canada.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.